Connect with us

A change is gonna come …

A change is gonna come ...


A change is gonna come …

Change management is a tricky exercise with big penalties attached. Here’s how to get it right.

Effective change management in today’s high-velocity business environment is akin to, in the words of a baseball player trying to hit against pitching great Sandy Koufax, “drinking coffee with a fork.”

According to a 2015 multi-industry survey by consultancy CEB Global, 87 percent of executives expect the pace of their organization’s change initiatives to remain constant, or to increase, during the next three years. About 70 percent of executives said today’s changes are more complex than they’ve ever been. The level of complexity is reflected in the outcomes; between 50 and 60 percent of change initiatives will fail, while 16 percent will show mixed results, according to the survey. Only about one-third of change management projects are considered successful.

About 60 percent of managers said they lack the proper experience to adequately implement change management programs, according to CEB. This can cause change-related stress that rolls downhill, with severe performance penalties attached. CEB estimates that the change-stressed employee performs 5 percent worse than the average employee. For the typical company, this means a $32.5 million hit to the bottom line for every $1 billion in revenue, the firm said.

Companies “undertake each change with the goal of improving business performance, yet each change also pressures employees to adapt,” according to a CEB white paper. Perversely, stress-related performance losses can counteract the initiative’s expected benefits, the firm said. It is perhaps with good reason that CEB refers to change management struggles as the “hidden enemy of productivity” in the workplace.

One of the challenges is that change can come from anywhere and can hit all at once. It can spring from the launch of a distribution center or the introduction of an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system or the integration of an acquired company. Change can also result from a renewed focus on broad growth strategies that aren’t triggered by a specific event. iPlan Global, a South African firm that specializes in business process design and implementation, segregates change management strategies into the “transformative,” which focuses on long-range shifts in corporate culture, and the “discontinuous,” or event-driven initiatives such as preparing for an overnight switchover to a new IT system.

“Transformative change is approached as a … long-term effort that encompasses a number of separate standalone assignments that effect specific change in individuals,” said Adri McCaskill, iPlan Global’s general manager for North America. Discontinuous change, by contrast, involves projects that are aligned to one “make-or-break” objective, such as a transition to a new IT platform, she added.


Fortna, a West Reading, Pa.-based systems design and integration company, thought enough of the change management skill set’s importance to create a position dedicated to “organizational readiness” and to recruit Mike Perkins, an operations veteran with decades of experience with companies like e-tailer Inc., mail-order giant L.L.Bean Inc., and grocery chain Hannaford Supermarkets, to run it.

In a phone interview, Perkins said he has broadened Fortna’s change management efforts beyond the tactical, plain-vanilla approach to encompass more strategic, custom-designed initiatives. “I believe that change management is a subset or component of organizational leadership,” he said. Organizational leadership is “more strategic and holistic than the normal change management methodology” because it represents an enterprisewide approach that includes change management.

In one project, Fortna is hiring the leadership team to run a client’s new distribution center, a process that involves significant talent evaluation and employee training and development. Perkins said Fortna’s in-depth approach to change management is unique among systems integrators.

Perkins said each client is unique in its comprehension of change management and how to approach it. Some are capable of matching the resources to the project, some have relatively scant resources but are aware there’s a problem and have sought help, and still others have underestimated the scope of the challenge and the investment needed to get ahead of it, he said.

Whatever the case, companies that undertake a change management initiative need to understand that the results will appear like a “J-curve,” that is, they will get worse before they improve, Perkins said. “The key is shortening the dip,” he said.

If there is any universal metric for an effective change management program, it is to prepare people for the change, and create a sense of excitement and ownership in the program, Perkins said. Projects fail due to a lack of communication, a dearth of resources, and a failure to fully engage employees in the process, Perkins added. “These things always come back to bite you,” he said, adding that “some of the simplest things I wanted to implement took too long, while some of the tougher things went well.”


iPlan Global said the traditional approach to change management—enabling permanent change in the individual by focusing on long-term behavior and attitude modification—remains appropriate for broad “transformational” projects. However, a discontinuous event calls for what McCaskill described as a “hard subordination of individuals to the goal of the organization, even though there may be individual casualties.”

Dr. Abré Pienaar, iPlan Global’s CEO, said in a white paper earlier this year that successful execution in an event-driven scenario such as an ERP system launch stems from the organization, not certain individuals, doing a better job of operating the ERP system. “This does not require 100 percent of the people. Only a sufficient number in the right places,” he wrote. Trying to accommodate each person to work to individual timetables is an impossible task when implementing an ERP project, which has inflexible “go-live” dates, Pienaar said.

Furthermore, a focus on the whole enterprise means that those individuals who failed to adapt to the new system can be “accepted, and even expected and planned for, without sufficiently affecting the success of the organization,” Pienaar said.


Change management has traditionally been viewed as a soft science, but failing to adapt to organizational shifts presents a significant business risk. All parts of the organization will require new approaches to avoid unwanted losses while preserving the benefits of whatever transformation is under way, experts say. However, with the right preparation, executives can capture the benefits they’re striving for, with minimal or no casualties.

Continue Reading
You may also like...
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Leadership

  • Netflix Has No Rules Because They Hire Great People Netflix Has No Rules Because They Hire Great People


    Netflix Has No Rules Because They Hire Great People


    Previously I’ve written about the downside of rules at work and how rules can be replaced...

  • Change starts here - Millennials at the World Economic Forum Change starts here - Millennials at the World Economic Forum


    Change starts here – Millennials at the World Economic Forum


    50 young people – all under the age of 30 – have been invited to this...

  • Simon Sinek on Millennials in the Workplace Simon Sinek on Millennials in the Workplace


    Simon Sinek on Millennials in the Workplace


    Excerpt of Simon Sinek from an episode of Inside Quest. Simon Sinek understands leadership. He...

  • Here’s a wish list for leadership in 2017 Here’s a wish list for leadership in 2017


    Here’s a wish list for leadership in 2017


    By Ritch Eich America appears to be continuing down the same divided path that plagued our...

  • Good bosses switch between two leadership styles Good bosses switch between two leadership styles


    Good bosses switch between two leadership styles


    Dominant leaders should try to harness their egos and overcome the relationship difficulties that often result...

  • How to handle harsh colleagues when you work in banking How to handle harsh colleagues when you work in banking


    How to handle harsh colleagues when you work in banking


    From my perspective as a corporate trainer – and a guy once worked at a “soul-sucking”...

  • Leadership

    4 steps to making leaders more accountable


    What does it take to be an accountable leader? As global leaders continue to face unprecedented...

  • Leadership

    What does it take to be a great leader in times of change? We asked six experts


    What skills do all leaders need in these volatile times? “Leaders must understand that we are...

  • Leadership

    8 leadership lessons from history


    “If I have one piece of advice for would-be leaders, it is read some history.” Napoleon,...

  • Leadership Development For Millennials Not Seen As A Priority Leadership Development For Millennials Not Seen As A Priority


    Leadership Development For Millennials Not Seen As A Priority


      Leadership Development For Millennials Not Seen As A Priority Click here to view original post...

To Top